You are here
Home ›EDAL case summaries
Country of Decision: France
Country of Applicant: Russia (Chechnya)
Keywords: Revocation of protection status, Terrorism
The French National Court on Asylum (CNDA) based its reasoning on the CJEU jurisprudence according to which the Article 14 of the Directive 2011/95/EU transposed in Article L.711-6 CESEDA, allows revocation of refugee status, but does not imply that the refugee protection ceases. The international refugee protection under the Article 1 (A) (2) of the Geneva Convention continues to be applicable to the Applicant.
Date: 05-07-2019
Country of Decision: Spain
Country of Applicant: Iraq
Keywords: Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect), Subsidiary Protection
Even if not explicitly referred to in domestic laws, such as the Civil Code, those previsions on subsidiary protection should be interpreted in light of international law. Therefore, even if the literal interpretation of article 22.3 of the Civil Code only refers to asylum, the consideration of the social context and international law would call for an extension of this provision on reduced residency requirements to also cover those holding subsidiary protection status.
Date: 10-04-2019
Country of Decision: Spain
Country of Applicant: Venezuela
Date: 18-10-2018
Country of Decision: United Kingdom
Keywords: Dublin Transfer, Effective access to procedures, Effective remedy (right to), Unaccompanied minor
The Court of Appeal found the "one-off" expedited procedure in place from 2016-2017 in Calais for unaccompanied children with family members, siblings or relatives in the UK and operated by the British and French authorities to fall below the requirements of procedural fairness as a matter of common law.
Date: 31-07-2018
Country of Decision: Denmark
Country of Applicant: Uganda
Keywords: Discrimination, Membership of a particular social group, Refugee Status, Relevant Facts, Sexual orientation, Well-founded fear
The applicant, an ethnic Samia and Christian Protestant from Mukono, Uganda, became aware of his sexual orientation when he was between 7 and 9 years old and has had several both short and longer relations with men.
The Refugee Appeals Board accepted the applicants account which included imprisonment and physical and sexual abuse as well as harassment by village locals. Consequently, the Board found that the applicant was at risk of persecution by his family and locals against which no protection by the authorities could be obtained. Therefore, the applicant was granted refugee...
Date: 17-05-2018
Country of Decision: France
Country of Applicant: Sudan
Keywords: Dublin Transfer, Effective access to procedures, Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Material reception conditions, Reception conditions, Request to take back
There are systemic deficiencies in the Italian asylum procedure and in its reception conditions for asylum applicants which amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
Date: 05-01-2018
Country of Decision: Slovenia
Country of Applicant: Afghanistan
Če prosilec za mednarodno zaščito zatrjuje, da v odgovorni državi članici obstajajo pomanjkljivosti azilnega postopka (v skladu s 3. členom Dublinske uredbe III), ima država, ki odloča, dolžnost raziskati sistematske pomanjkljivosti azilnega postopka v skladu z obrnjenim dokaznim bremenom.
Date: 18-06-2015
Country of Decision: Spain
Country of Applicant: Kazakhstan
Keywords: Country of origin information, Exclusion from protection, Individual assessment, Political Opinion
When applying art. 1.F) of the Convention, there is a need of proving that the appellant is a concrete danger for the national security. As it is a restriction for the right of asylum, this provision should be applied restrictively. In the instant case, there is no sufficient indication that the applicant constitutes danger to national security.
Date: 17-07-2014
Country of Decision: Slovenia
Keywords: Načelo nevračanja, Odgovornost za obravnavanje prošnje, Posredno vračanje, Pravica do bivanja, dokler odločanje o vlogi ni končano (suspenzivni učinek), Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, Varna tretja država, Vračanje
Izpodbijana ureditev je v neskladju z Ustavo zaradi nejasnosti načina ugotavljanja pristojnosti tretje države za vsebinsko obravnavanje prošnje, nejasnosti položaja prosilca za mednarodno zaščito, če po izdaji sklepa o zavrženju prošnje tretja država ne dovoli vstopa na svoje ozemlje, in nejasnosti okoliščin, ki jih prosilec lahko izpodbija v tem postopku.
Učinkovito pravno sredstvo proti izgonu v državo, kjer je prosilec lahko izpostavljen nečloveškemu ravnanju, mora imeti samo po sebi suspenzivni učinek.
Date: 18-12-2013
Country of Decision: Slovenia
Country of Applicant: Afghanistan
Keywords: Okoliščine, ki več ne obstajajo, Prenehanje zaščite, Subsidiarna zaščita
V postopku podaljšanja subsidiarne zaščite so relevantni vsi razlogi, ki jih je prosilec navedel v prošnji za mednarodno zaščito, in ne zgolj tisti razlogi, na podlagi katerih je bila subsidiarna zaščita podeljena.
Date: 05-09-2013
Pages
Languages
Filter by case summary type
Filter by applicable legal provisions
Filter by keywords
- Informacije o državi izvora 7
- Ocena dejstev in okoliščin 6
- Ocena verodostojnosti 6
- Subsidiarna zaščita 6
- Dokazno breme 4
- Dolžnost prosilca 4
- Nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje 4
- Osebne okoliščine prosilca 4
- Načelo nevračanja 3
- Pospešeni postopek 3
- Prenos na podlagi Uredbe Dublin II 3
- Pripadnost določeni družbeni skupini 3
- Varna tretja država 3
- Diskriminacija 2
- Dublin Transfer 2
- Effective access to procedures 2
- Individualna obravnava 2
- Načelo največje otrokove koristi 2
- Odgovornost za obravnavanje prošnje 2
- Očitno neutemeljena prošnja 2
- Postopkovna zagotovila 2
- Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva 2
- Relevantna dejstva 2
- Resna škoda 2
- Vidiki, povezani z otrokom 2
- Zdravniška poročila / Zdravniško-pravna poročila 2
- Country of origin information 1
- Dejanja preganjanja 1
- Discrimination 1
- Dokazni standard 1
- Družinski član 1
- Effective remedy (right to) 1
- Exclusion from protection 1
- Individual assessment 1
- Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 1
- Material reception conditions 1
- Materialni sprejemni pogoji 1
- Membership of a particular social group 1
- Mladoletnik brez spremstva 1
- Notranja zaščita 1
- Obveznost / dolžnost sodelovanja 1
- Odlog 1
- Okoliščine, ki več ne obstajajo 1
- Osebni razgovor 1
- Political Opinion 1
- Posredno vračanje 1
- Pravica do bivanja, dokler odločanje o vlogi ni končano (suspenzivni učinek) 1
- Pravica do enotne družine 1
- Pravica do svobode gibanja 1
- Pravica do zdravja 1
- Prenehanje zaščite 1
- Ranljiva oseba 1
- Razlogi za preganjanje 1
- Reception conditions 1
- Refugee Status 1
- Relevant Facts 1
- Relevantna dokumentacija 1
- Request to take back 1
- Revocation of protection status 1
- Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect) 1
- Sexual orientation 1
- Subsidiary Protection 1
- Terrorism 1
- Unaccompanied minor 1
- Utemeljen strah 1
- Vračanje 1
- Well-founded fear 1
- Zahteva za ponovni sprejem 1
- Zatečeni begunec 1
- Združevanje družine 1
Filter by country of applicant
- Afghanistan 8
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 2
- Somalia 2
- Tunisia 2
- Unknown 2
- China 1
- Iran 1
- Iraq 1
- Kazakhstan 1
- Russia (Chechnya) 1
- Serbia 1
- Sudan 1
- Uganda 1
- Venezuela 1
Filter by country of decision
- Slovenia 21
- Spain 3
- France 2
- Denmark 1
- United Kingdom 1
