Ngono v Belgium (Application No. 23057/19): On 9 March 2020, the European Court of Human Rights published the case of Ngono v Belgium, communicated in September 2019 and February 2020. The applicant suffers from diffuse hepatic angiomatosis and argues that in the event of return to Cameroon she would not have access to the necessary medical follow up appointments and adequate treatment.
On 27 February 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) published its judgment (C‑836/18) on the interpretation of Article 20 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the need for sufficient financial re
On 25 February 2020, the European Court of Human Rights published its judgment in the case of A.S.N and others v The Netherlands (Application Nos. 68377/17 and 530/18) concerning the risk of ill-treatment of Sikhs in Afghanistan.
On 20 February 2020, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) published its judgment in the case of PS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKUT 46 (IAC) concerning the potential risk of persecution due to conversion to Christianity in the event of return to Iran.
On 20 February 2020, the Human Rights Committee (the Committee) published its views in the case of Q.A v Sweden (CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017) concerning risk of ill-treatment in the event of deportation to Afghanistan.
On 20 February 2020, the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) published its judgment in M.A and Others v Bulgaria (Application No. 5115/18) concerning the extradition of five applicants to China.
On 18 February 2020, the High Court of England and Wales (the Court) published its judgment in the case of Suliman v Secretary of State [2020] EWHC 326 concerning a rejected application for indefinite leave to remain as a victim of domestic violence.
